Pulmonary hypertension is defined as a mean arterial pressure of ≥25 mmHg as confirmed on right heart catheterisation. Traditionally, the pulmonary arterial systolic pressure has been estimated on echo by utilising the simplified Bernoulli equation from the peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity and adding this to an estimate of right atrial pressure. Previous studies have demonstrated a correlation between this estimate of pulmonary arterial systolic pressure and that obtained from invasive measurement across a cohort of patients. However, for an individual patient significant overestimation and underestimation can occur and the levels of agreement between the two is poor. Recent guidance has suggested that echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary hypertension should be limited to determining the probability of pulmonary hypertension being present rather than estimating the pulmonary artery pressure. In those patients in whom the presence of pulmonary hypertension requires confirmation, this should be done with right heart catheterisation when indicated. This guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography aims to outline a practical approach to assessing the probability of pulmonary hypertension using echocardiography and should be used in conjunction with the previously published minimum dataset for a standard transthoracic echocardiogram.
The British Society of Echocardiography (BSE) Education Committee has previously published a minimum dataset for a standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram (1). This document specifically states that the minimum dataset is usually only sufficient when the echocardiographic study is entirely normal. However, the BSE Education Committee has published a number of supplementary guidelines to cover specific pathologies to be utilised in conjunction with this minimum dataset.
The intended benefits of such supplementary recommendations are to:
Support cardiologists and echocardiographers to develop local protocols and quality control programmes for an adult transthoracic study.
Promote quality by defining a set of descriptive terms and measurements, in conjunction with a systematic approach to performing and reporting a study in specific disease states.
Facilitate the accurate comparison of serial echocardiograms performed in patients at the same or different sites.
In this guideline, the important measurements that should be performed when assessing a patient’s probability of having pulmonary hypertension (PH) are discussed. Some of these views are part of the minimum dataset but the majority are additional. The aim of this document is to provide practical recommendations for the image and analysis dataset required in patients being assessed for possible PH, or where the diagnosis is known and is consistent with the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of PH (2). Estimation of PH in patients with left heart disease such as valvular heart disease remains within current guidelines (3, 4, 5). Estimation of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) within these patients is reasonable, at rest and during exercise (3, 6) or during follow-up of an individual patient. However, confirmation with right heart catheterisation (RHC) should be considered, particularly if the presence of PH is a major component of any decision to refer for intervention.
This guideline replaces the previous protocol on PH published by the BSE and will be reviewed and updated in the future as a result of future publications or changes in best practice.
PH is presently defined as an increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure to ≥25 mmHg at rest as assessed by right heart catheterisation (2). The clinical significance of a mean pulmonary arterial pressure between 21 mmHg and 24 mmHg is unclear. It can complicate many cardiovascular, respiratory and connective tissue diseases. Untreated, morbidity and mortality levels are high (7, 8) and therefore accurate and prompt diagnosis is crucial. The diagnosis of PH requires a clinical suspicion based on symptoms, physical examination and review of a comprehensive set of investigations. Echocardiography is a key imaging modality in the assessment of patients with suspected or known PH.
The classification of PH categorises different clinical conditions into five groups (Table 1). This is an important categorisation for two reasons: first, the most common form of PH encountered in any echocardiography department will be secondary to left heart disease (9) and hence a full study with consideration of indirect measures of elevation in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure must be performed in all cases consistent with the minimum dataset (1); secondly, the interpretation of supportive measurements for classification of patients with intermediate probability of PH, such pulmonary artery acceleration/mid systolic notching, must be taken in the context of the possible underlying cause as these may be more likely in cases with pre-capillary PH.
Classification of PH.
|WHO group||Aetiology of pulmonary hypertension||Mean pulmonary arterial wedge pressure||Example causes|
|1||Pulmonary arterial hypertension||Normal||Idiopathic, hereditary, drug or toxin induced, shunts related to congenital heart disease, connective tissue disease, portal hypertension, chronic haemolytic anaemia|
|2||Pulmonary hypertension secondary to left heart disease||Increased||Valvular heart disease, systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction, pericardial disease, congenital/acquired left heart inflow/outflow tract obstruction, congenital cardiomyopathies|
|3||Pulmonary hypertension secondary to lung disease||Normal||Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe asthma, interstitial lung disease, sleep apnoea, long term exposure to high altitude, congenital lung abnormalities|
|4||Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)||Normal||Chronic pulmonary embolism|
|5||Pulmonary hypertension with unclear and/or multifactorial mechanisms||Normal or increased||Systemic diseases, sarcoidosis, vasculitis, haematological malignancies, chronic renal failure, metabolic disorders, lung tumours|
Adapted from World Health Organisation Classification of PH (10).
Each of these groups can further be categorised as to whether there is normal pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (an estimate of left atrial pressure) or elevated pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, which may be helpful in identifying the aetiology of PH. The World Health Classification of PH is outlined in Table 1.
The traditional echocardiographic approach to estimating pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) uses a derivation of right ventricular pressure from the tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity added to a qualitative assessment of right atrial pressure (RAP). Previous studies have demonstrated good correlation across patient populations but only moderate precision of absolute PASP values calculated from TR velocity (TRV)max (11, 12, 13, 14). This is important as in an individual patient, significant under and over estimation can occur leading to misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment (15).
There are number of reasons why the level of agreement between the estimated pressures derived by echocardiography and those measured invasively is poor. First, errors may occur in accurate measurement of the peak TRV signal. This can result in both over estimation and underestimation if the quality of the Doppler signals is poor or inaccurate as a result of suboptimal Doppler alignment due to eccentric jets. When estimating right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) from the TRV using the Bernoulli equation, the TRV is squared and multiplied by 4, so even small errors in the absolute measurement of TRV can result in significant changes to the estimate of RVSP. Secondly, in order to obtain an estimate of PASP, the RVSP needs to be added to an estimate of the RAP derived from measurement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) dimensions and response to inspiration. However, in many patients, IVC dimensions cannot be obtained and even in those where measurement is possible, the accuracy between echo estimation of RAP and invasive measurement is as low as 34% (16). Thirdly, it is well recognised that in patients with severe free-flowing TR that the correlation between TRV and RVSP is poor and should not be performed (17). In addition, absence of TR is insufficient to exclude the presence of PH. For example, one study has shown that in patients with scleroderma being screened for PH, if a TRV cut-off of 2.7 m/s was used, this would have excluded some patients who had a mean pulmonary arterial pressure >40 mmHg (18). Furthermore, the expected normal upper limit of PASP depends on BMI (19).
In view of these factors, when screening patients with suspected PH, information obtained from echocardiography can only grade the probability of PH being present rather than provide a definitive diagnosis. Therefore, when assessing the probability of PH, the measurement of TRV should be used in conjunction with other echocardiographic markers of PH. Thus, the information in this protocol is intended to be used as a guide and the data have been selected by consensus using as much evidence base as possible. Future studies assessing the accuracy of this probability-based approach in the diagnosis of PH will be beneficial and add to the evidence base. The invasive measurement of pulmonary artery pressure during right heart cardiac catheterisation is required to confirm or refute a diagnosis of PH.
The first step in assessing the echocardiographic probability of PH being present is to measure the peak TRV. If this is a good-quality signal and is greater than 3.4 m/s, there is a high probability of PH being present. If the peak TRV is below 3.4 m/s, the probability of PH is assessed in combination with other echocardiographic markers.
This approach based on estimation of likelihood is recommended for all clinical groups of PH. Additional considerations in specific subsets of patients are included in the ‘Appendices’ section. The assessment of probability of PH by echocardiography is just one part in the overall clinical judgement as to the presence of PH in a certain individual. Echocardiographic findings should be interpreted alongside other clinical findings to establish the likelihood of PH prior to confirmatory diagnosis as needed by RHC.
Echocardiographic assessment of patents with PH
The flow chart depicted in Fig. 1 is used to assess the probability of PH. The echocardiographic parameters used for grading the probability of PH are set out in Table 2 and described further in Table 3. If the TRV is >3.4 m/s then the echocardiographic probability of PH is high. If the TRV is ≤3.4 m/s, then other echocardiographic parameters suggesting PH must be used to assign the probability of PH. These parameters are split into three categories (A: the ventricles; B: the pulmonary artery; C: the IVC and right atrium). Parameters from at least two different categories are needed to determine the probability of PH.
Echocardiographic signs used to help grade the probability of PH.
|A: The ventriclesa||B: Pulmonary arterya||C: Inferior vena cava and right atriuma|
|Right ventricle/left ventricle basal diameter ratio >1.0||Right ventricular outflow Doppler acceleration time <105 ms and/or mid systolic notching||Inferior vena cava diameter >21 mm with decreased inspiratory collapse (<50% with a sniff or <20% with quiet respiration)|
|Flattening of the interventricular septum (left ventricular eccentricity index >1.1 in systole or both systole and diastole)||Early diastolic pulmonary regurgitation (PR) velocity >2.2 m/s||Right atrial area (end systole) >18 cm2|
|PA diameter >25 mm|
aEchocardiographic parameters from at least two different categories (A/B/C) from the list should be present to alter the level of echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension.
Minimum requirements needed to assess the probability of pulmonary hypertension.
|Measurements||View (modality)||Explanatory note||Image|
|Peak TR velocity||A4CPSAX/RV inflow (CW)||Peak TRV is measured by CW Doppler across the tricuspid valve. Multiple views may need to be taken to obtain the optimal window. These include the RV inflow, parasternal short axis (PSAX), apical 4-chamber (A4C) view, subcostal view or a modified view between the PSAX and A4C (20)|
Ensure the CW Doppler to flow angle is correctly aligned. Eccentric jets can lead to incomplete Doppler envelopes and underestimation of TR velocity. A high sweep speed (100 mm/s) (21) can help to differentiate between true velocities and artefact
Velocity can be under estimated in severe/free TR and should be stated in the report (see ‘Appendices’ section)
Measure from a complete TR envelope. Choose the highest velocity (average of five beats in atrial fibrillation)
A TRV <2.8 m/s is considered normal (2, 22)
|Pulmonary artery (PA) diameter||PSAX (2D)||PA dimension is measured in end diastole halfway between the PV and bifurcation of main PA (21)|
The PA dilates in response to volume and pressure overload
A diameter of >25 mm is considered abnormal (2)
|RV outflow tract (RVOT) acceleration time (AT)||PSAX (PW)||A pulsed wave (PW) Doppler measurement taken after positioning the sample volume just below the pulmonic cusp on the RV side in the RV outflow tract (23)|
Measure at end expiration from the onset of flow to peak flow velocity. As pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increases, the acceleration time of the RV ejection into the PA shortens
Use the average of five beats in atrial fibrillation. Heart rates outside of the normal range (<70 or >100 bpm) may reduce accuracy and a correction for heart rate (HR) may be used (RVOT AT × 75/HR) (24, 25, 26)
When pulmonary pressures measured invasively are >25 mmHg, changes in heart rate have no significant effect on acceleration time (25)
Acceleration time of <105 ms is considered a marker of raised PAP (27)
|Early diastolic PR velocity||PSAX or parasternal RV outflow view (CW)||A CW Doppler measurement through the pulmonary valve in line with the PR jet. Multiple views may be needed to obtain the best PR signal. The peak (early/beginning of diastole) PR velocity (PRVBD) value is measured. This may have additional value when TRV cannot be used or relied upon|
An early PR velocity >2.2 m/s is considered a marker of raised mean PAP (2)
|Pulmonary systolic notch||PSAX (PW)||A PW Doppler measurement taken after positioning the sample volume just below the pulmonic cusp on the RV side in the RV outflow tract (15)|
Increased pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial stiffness can cause a reflection of waves which return towards the RV during systole. This impedes RV ejection and causes ‘notching’ of the Doppler profile
The presence of a pulmonary systolic notch is considered a marker of raised PAP
The presence of a pulmonary mid systolic notch is more likely to represent increased pulmonary vascular resistance and poor vascular compliance in keeping with pre-capillary PH, rather than PH due to left heart disease (28)
|Eccentricity index (EI)||PSAX (2D)||Measure from PSAX view at mid LV level between papillary muscle and tips of mitral valve leaflets. End systole is taken as the frame with the smallest LV cavity; end diastole is measured on the peak of the R-wave (29)|
The ratio of the minor axis dimensions as shown in the image (D2/D1) measured at end systole and end diastole. D1 = left ventricular diameter perpendicular to the septum; D2 = left ventricular diameter parallel to the septum
RV pressure and volume overload can lead to an abnormal shape and function of the interventricular septum, resulting in flattening
RV volume overload causes eccentricity in diastole only. RV pressure overload also causes eccentricity in systole. Off-axis PSAX images may cause artefactual eccentricity
Left ventricular eccentricity index>1.1 is considered abnormal (2)
|RV/LV basal diameter ratio||A4C (2D)||This is measured from the standard A4C view without foreshortening. Measurement is taken at end diastole|
Ratio of >1 measured at end diastole suggests RV dilatation (2)
|Right atrial area||A4C (2D)||Measure at end ventricular systole on the frame just prior to tricuspid valve opening|
Trace the RA from the plane of the TV annulus along the IAS, superior and lateral walls of RA
RAA >18 cm2 is considered abnormal (21, 30)
|Inferior vena cava diameter (IVC)||Subcostal (2D M-mode)||Diameter is measured perpendicular to the IVC long axis, 1–2 cm from the RA junction at end expiration|
Assess size and percentage reduction in diameter with sniffing or quiet inspiration
IVC diameter >21 mm with decreased inspiratory collapse (<50% with a sniff or <20% with quiet respiration) is considered abnormal (2)
Echocardiography also provides information about aetiology and prognosis in patients with PH. Patients with established PH or high probability for PH should have full assessment to exclude left-sided heart disease or intracardiac shunts as the cause of PH. Right ventricular dilatation and dysfunction are considered poor prognostic markers in patients with PH. Additional measurements that can be used to assess patients with PH are shown in Table 4.
Useful additional features and prognostic findings in patients with established PH.
|Measurements||View (modality)||Explanatory note||Image|
|Pericardial effusion||All views (2D)||The presence of a pericardial effusion due to PH is a sign of advanced disease with poor prognosis (31, 32)|
|RV dimensions (RVD1, RVD2, RVD3)||A4C (2D)||Due to increasing preload and afterload, progressive right ventricular dilatation is seen with worsening pulmonary hypertension|
All measurements are taken at end diastole in the RV-focused view (33). RV size may be underestimated due to the crescentric RV shape
RVD1: Basal RV diameter. Measured at the maximal transverse diameter in the basal one third of the RV. RVD1 >41 mm is abnormal (33)
RVD2: Mid RV diameter measured at the level of the LV papillary muscles
RVD2 >35 mm is abnormal (33)
RVD3: RV length (end diastole from the plane of the tricuspid annulus to the RV apex)
RVD3 >83 mm is abnormal (33)
|Fractional area change (FAC)||A4C (2D)||Manual tracing of the RV endocardial border from the lateral tricuspid annulus along the free wall to the apex and back along the interventricular septum to medial tricuspid valve annulus at end diastole and end systole. A disadvantage of this measure is that it neglects the contribution of the RV outflow tract to overall systolic function|
FAC = (RVAd − RVAs)/RVAd
RV FAC <35% indicates RV systolic dysfunction (33)
|RV pulsed tissue Doppler S wave (Sʹ) velocity||A4C (PW TDI)||PW tissue Doppler S wave measurement taken at the lateral tricuspid annulus in systole. It is important to ensure the basal RV free wall segment and the lateral tricuspid annulus are aligned with the Doppler cursor to avoid velocity underestimation|
A disadvantage of this measure is that it assumes that the function of a single segment represents the function of the entire ventricle, which is not likely in conditions that include regionality such as RV infarction (21)
Sʹ wave velocity <9.5 cm/s indicates RV systolic dysfunction (33)
|Myocardial performance index (RIMP)||A4C (PW or PW TDI)||RIMP is an index of global RV performance. The isovolumic contraction time (IVCT), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and ejection time intervals can be measured using tissue Doppler or pulsed wave Doppler|
Pulsed wave Doppler or tissue Doppler methods require a sample positioned at the lateral tricuspid valve annulus. However, RIMP derived from pulsed wave Doppler also requires an additional sample from the RVOT and both pulse wave samples need to have near-identical R-R intervals (i.e. heart rate). Tissue Doppler is preferred as it is derived from a single sample
RIMP >0.43 by pulsed wave Doppler or >0.54 by tissue Doppler indicates RV dysfunction (33)
Tissue Doppler values >0.64 are associated with worse prognosis (32)
|Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion (TAPSE)||A4C (M-mode)||This is an angle dependent measurement and therefore it is important to align the M-mode cursor along the direction of the lateral tricuspid annulus. Select a fast sweep speed|
The excursion of the lateral tricuspid annulus is measured by M-mode between end diastole and peak systole
A measure of longitudinal RV systolic function. TAPSE <1.7 cm is highly suggestive of RV systolic dysfunction (33)
Although not required when determining the likelihood of PH being present, a number of other echo markers can be useful in determining the severity of PH and may provide additional prognostic information (Table 4). These are particularly useful in those patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PH. These markers include right ventricular dimensions (RVD1 RVD2, RVD3), fractional area change and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). In addition, the peak systolic RV pulsed tissue Doppler velocity taken at the lateral tricuspid annulus and right ventricular index of myocardial performance (RIMP) can provide further information.
Other echocardiographic measurements
In addition to the echocardiographic measures discussed in this document, there are other echocardiographic markers that may be of use in assessing patients with PH. These measures include stroke volume, cardiac output and pulmonary vascular resistance, although the value of serial measures of these by echocardiography has not been validated. These measures may be of value where further haemodynamic information is required:
Pulmonary arterial end-diastolic pressure (PDP). Measure pulmonary regurgitant jet velocity taken at end diastole (PRVED) (Fig. 2).
PDP = 4(PRVED)2 + RAP
Mean pulmonary artery pressure (31). Measure pulmonary regurgitant jet velocity taken at the beginning of diastole (PRVBD).
Mean PAP = 4(PRVBD)2 + RAP
Surrogates of heart function (e.g. stroke volume index and cardiac index) have been shown to be associated with prognosis (32, 34). It is possible to estimate these values using echocardiography (Table 5) although the preferred option would be by thermodilution at RHC (2).Table 5
Calculations to assess markers of ventricular function.
Measure Echocardiographic assessment Cross sectional area (CSA) left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) (LVOT diameter)2 × 0.785 Stroke volume (SV) Velocity time integral (VTI)(LVOT) × Cross sectional area (CSA)(LVOT) Cardiac output (CO) Stroke volume × heart rate (HR) Stroke volume index (SVi) Stroke volume/body surface area (BSA) Cardiac index (CI) CO/BSA
Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) can be measured using TRV (m/s) and VTIRVOT (cm):
PVR (Wood units) = 10 × (TRV/VTIRVOT) + 0.16. Here, a TRV/VTIRVOT <0.2 corresponds approximately to a PVR of <2 Wood units (35).
Peak TR velocity is the key parameter in determining the probability of PH, but the TR signal can be absent in a proportion of patients. The prevalence of TR in patients with a PASP ≥35 mmHg is only 80% but increases to greater than 95% in those with PASP >50 mmHg (36). If the TR signal is absent, probability estimation should be based on clinical context taking into consideration other concordant clinical and echocardiographic signs of RV pressure overload (Fig. 1). In patients with a trivial TR jet or sub optimal continuous wave Doppler spectrum, injection of intravenous agitated saline can be considered to improve the Doppler signal allowing measurement of peak TR velocity (37) (Fig. 3). As a default, if clinical suspicion remains, invasive measurement of pulmonary pressures should be recommended.
In patients with severe TR, TR velocity can be significantly underestimated and cannot be used alone to exclude PH. The severity of the volume of TR is distinct from velocity and the probability of PH in this context should be determined in conjunction with other echocardiographic parameters (Fig. 1).
Assessment of PH in patients with left heart disease
This guideline endorses the use of a probability-based approach for the assessment of PH in all clinical subgroups including those secondary to left-sided heart disease. A full assessment including history, ECG and echocardiography will help to identify PH due to left heart disease (38). This is important as left heart disease will be the major aetiology of PH encountered in echocardiography departments (9). If there is an intermediate or high probability of PH then further echocardiographic evaluation should be made to exclude a cardiac cause for PH. In particular, this should prompt a careful assessment of LV systolic and diastolic function, measurement of left atrial volume and exclusion of left-sided valve disease (Table 6). Colour flow Doppler should be used to exclude atrial and ventricular septal defects. Following a thorough clinical review, a bubble study and transoesophageal echocardiogram may be considered to fully exclude cardiac causes of PH, especially in those patients with confirmed PH.
Features which may suggest left heart disease causing PH.
|PH due to left heart disease group||Echocardiographic features suggesting left heart disease may be cause of PH|
|LV systolic dysfunction||Dilated LV; reduced LV ejection fraction|
|LV diastolic dysfunction||E/e′ >10 (39); left atrial dilatation (40); left ventricular hypertrophy (38)|
|Valvular heart disease||>Mild valvular disease|
|Congenital heart disease||Presence of intra and extra cardiac defects|
It is recognised that some guidelines use an absolute PASP value to guide management of patients with PH secondary to left heart disease. In patients with severe mitral valve disease, a PASP >50 mm Hg is considered a class IIa indication for surgery (3, 4). Evidence for this is largely based on invasive pulmonary artery pressure measurements, but there are limited echocardiographic studies suggesting a prognostic role for PASP derived from TR velocity and RA pressure (41, 42). In this subset of patients, in addition to determining probability of PH using TR velocity, resting PASP can be estimated by echocardiography using standard methods (4). Confirmation by invasive measurement is required before considering valve surgery if elevated PASP is the main or only reason triggering intervention.
In patients with suspected PH, the following echo parameters should be used to assess the probability of PH:
Peak TR velocity
Basal LV/RV diameter ratio
RVOT acceleration time and/or mid systolic notching
Early diastolic PR velocity
RA and IVC
IVC size and respiratory variability
Echocardiography should be used to assess the probability of PH being present. Confirmation with right heart catheterisation is warranted if a definitive diagnosis of PH is needed, particularly if pre-capillary PH-specific therapies may be indicated.
|A4C||Apical four chamber|
|BSA||Body surface area|
|BSE||British Society of Echocardiography|
|FAC||Fractional area change|
|IVC||Inferior vena cava|
|IVCT||Isovolumetric contraction time|
|IVRT||Isovolumetric relaxation time|
|PAP||Pulmonary artery pressure|
|PASP||Pulmonary artery systolic pressure|
|PDP||Pulmonary arterial end diastolic pressure|
|PRVBD||Pulmonary regurgitant velocity at the beginning of diastole|
|PRVED||Pulmonary regurgitant velocity at the end of diastole|
|PSAX||Parasternal short axis|
|PVR||Pulmonary vascular resistance|
|RAA||Right atrial area|
|RAP||Right atrial pressure|
|RHC||Right heart catheterisation|
|RIMP||Right ventricular index of myocardial performance|
|RVAd/s||Right ventricular area in diastole/systole|
|RVD||Right ventricular diameter|
|RVOT||Right ventricular outflow tract|
|RVSP||Right ventricular systolic pressure|
|SVi||Stroke volume index|
|TAPSE||Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion|
|TRV||Tricuspid regurgitation velocity|
|VTI||Velocity time integral|
Declaration of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this guideline.
The publication of this article was sponsored by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. The article was produced by the British Society of Echocardiography independently of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, and they were not able to influence its content. Peer review was carried out independently by the journal’s editorial board, based on scientific merit alone.
WhartonGSteedsRAllenJPhillipsHJonesRKanagalaPLloydGMasaniNMathewTOxboroughDet al. A minimum dataset for a standard adult transthoracic echocardiogram: a guideline protocol from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Research and Practice 2015 2 G9–G24. (https://doi.org/10.1530/ERP-14-0079)
GalieNHumbertMVachieryJLGibbsSLangITorbickiASimonneauGPeacockAVonk NoordegraafABeghettiMet al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: the joint task force for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). European Heart Journal 2016 37 67–119. (https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317)
NishimuraRAOttoCMBonowROCarabelloBAErwinJPFleisherLAJneidHMackMJMcLeodCJO'GaraPTet al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2017 70 252–289. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.011)
HoeperMMKramerTPanZEichstaedtCASpiesshoeferJBenjaminNOlssonKMMeyerKVizzaCDVonk-NoordegraafAet al. Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model. European Respiratory Journal 2017 50 1700740. (https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00740-2017)
SimonneauGGatzoulisMAAdatiaICelermajerDDentonCGhofraniAGomez SanchezMAKrishna KumarRLandzbergMMachadoRFet al. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013 62 D34. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.029)
D’AltoMRomeoEArgientoPD’AndreaAVanderpoolRCorreraABossoneESarubbiBCalabròRRussoMGet al. Accuracy and precision of echocardiography versus right heart catheterization for the assessment of pulmonary hypertension. International Journal of Cardiology 2017 168 4058–4062. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.005)
FisherMRForfiaPRChameraEHousten-HarrisTChampionHCGirgisRECorrettiMCHassounPM. Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2009 179 615–621. (https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200811-1691OC)
GreinerSJudAAurichMHessAHilbelTHardtSKatusHAMerelesD. Reliability of noninvasive assessment of systolic pulmonary artery pressure by Doppler echocardiography compared to right heart catheterization: analysis in a large patient population. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease 2014 3 e001103. (https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001103)
MagninoCOmedèPAvenattiEPresuttiDIannacconeAChiarloMMorettiCGaitaFVeglioFMilanAet al. Inaccuracy of right atrial pressure estimates through inferior vena cava indices. American Journal of Cardiology 2018 120 1667–1673. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.069)
FeiBFanTZhaoLPeiXShuXFangXChengL. Impact of severe tricuspid regurgitation on accuracy of systolic pulmonary arterial pressure measured by Doppler echocardiography: analysis in an unselected patient population. Echocardiography 2017 34 1082–1088. (https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.13555)
MukerjeeDSt. GeorgeDKnightCDavarJWellsAUDu BoisRMBlackCMCoghlanJG. Echocardiography and pulmonary function as screening tests for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2004 43 461–466. (https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh067)
CaballeroLKouSDulgheruRGonjilashviliNAthanassopoulosGDBaroneDCardimNGomez de DiegoJJOlivaMJHagendorffAet al. Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac Doppler data: results from the NORRE Study. European Heart Journal: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 16 1031–1041. (https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev083)
SchneiderMPistrittoAMGergesCGergesMBinderCLangIMaurerGBinderTGoliaschG. Multi-view approach for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension using transthoracic echocardiography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2017 34 695–700. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1279-8)
RudskiLGLaiWWAfilaloJHuaLHandschumacherMDChandrasekaranKSolomonSDLouieEKSchillerNB. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2017 23 685–713. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010)
ParasuramanSWalkerSLoudonBLGollopNDWilsonAMLoweryCFrenneauxMP. Assessment of pulmonary artery pressure by echocardiography: a comprehensive review. International Journal of Cardiology: Heart and Vasculature 2016 12 45–51. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.011)
MarraAMBenjaminNFerraraFVrizOD’AltoMD’AndreaAStanziolaAAGarganiLCittadiniAGrünigEet al. Reference ranges and determinants of right ventricle outflow tract acceleration time in healthy adults by two-dimensional echocardiography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2017 33 219–226. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0991-0)
ArklesJSOpotowskyAROjedaJRogersFLiuTPrassanaVMarzecLPalevskyHIFerrariVAForfiaPR. Shape of the right ventricular Doppler envelope predicts hemodynamics and right heart function in pulmonary hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2011 183 268–276. (https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201004-0601OC)
RyanTPetrovicODillonJCFeigenbaumHConleyMJArmstrongWF. An echocardiographic index for separation of right ventricular volume and pressure overload. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1985 5 918–927. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(85)80433-2)
BossoneED’AndreaAD’AltoMCitroRArgientoPFerraraFCittadiniARubenfireMNaeijeR. Echocardiography in pulmonary arterial hypertension: from diagnosis to prognosis. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2013 26 1–14. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2012.10.009)
GrapsaJPereira NunesMCTanTCCabritaIZCoulterTSmithBCFDawsonDGibbsJSRNihoyannopoulosP. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic predictors of survival in precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Clinical perspective. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2015 8 e002107. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.114.002107)
LangRMBadanoLPMor-AviVAfilaloJArmstrongAErnandeLFlachskampfFAFosterEGoldsteinSAKuznetsovaTet al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2015 28 1.e14–39.e14. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003)
WeatheraldJBouclyAChemlaDSavaleLPengMJevnikarMJaïsXTaniguchiYO’ConnellCParentFet al. Prognostic value of follow-up hemodynamic variables after initial management in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulation 2018 137 693–704. (https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029254)
BergerMHaimowitzAVan ToshABerdoffRLGoldbergE. Quantitative assessment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with tricuspid regurgitation using continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1985 6 359–365. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(85)80172-8)
PlattsDGVaishnavMBurstowDJCraigCHChanJSedgwickJFScaliaGM. Contrast microsphere enhancement of the tricuspid regurgitant spectral Doppler signal: is it still necessary with contemporary scanners? International Journal of Cardiology: Heart and Vasculature 2017 17 1–10. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2017.08.002)
D’AltoMRomeoEArgientoPPavelescuAMelotCD’AndreaACorreraABossoneECalabroRRussoMG. Echocardiographic prediction of pre- versus postcapillary pulmonary hypertension. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2017 28 108–115. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.09.004)
GhoreishiMEvansCFDeFilippiCRHobbsGYoungCAGriffithBPGammieJS. Pulmonary hypertension adversely affects short- and long-term survival after mitral valve operation for mitral regurgitation: Implications for timing of surgery. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2011 142 1439–1452. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.030)
MentiasAPatelKPatelHGillinovAMSabikJFMihaljevicTSuriRMRodriquezLLSvenssonLGGriffinBPet al. Effect of pulmonary vascular pressures on long-term outcome in patients with primary mitral regurgitation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2016 67 2952–2961. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.589)